Skip to main content

When Sachin Tendulkar owed his success to Dr Anjali Tendulkar.


“The most beautiful thing happened to me in 1990 when I met my wife Anjali. Those were special years and it has continued and it will always continue that way. I know Anjali being a doctor, there was a wonderful career in front of her. When we decided to have a family .Anjali took the initiative to step back and say that ‘you continue with your cricket and I will take the responsibility of the family’.
Without that I don’t think I would have been able to play cricket freely and without stress .thanks for bearing with all my fuss and all my frustrations and all sorts of rubbish that I have spoken. Thanks for bearing with me and always standing by my side through all my ups and downs .you are the best partnership I’ve ever had in my life.”
The excerpt says it all.
For me as a feminist this part was the piece-De resistance of the speech.
As it is the homemaker’s story. A homemaker who is always taken for granted. A homemaker who is considered substandard in a man’s world, whose dreams and identity are diluted when her family becomes her priority. She can make or break man’s world and ego too. That’s her power that nobody notices.
Had Dr Anjali Tendulkar  pursued her career, would Sachin be able to achieve this glory? Frankly speaking. NO.
His words remind us, the kind of social fabric we are woven in and how benighted is society’s approach towards a homemaker. Men who boast of their achievements would fall from fortunes of patriarchy if a homemaker withdrew her services.
For Sachin came publicly and acknowledged Ms Tendulkar’s role but most Indian males fail to. If their wives are working, they somehow curtail their dominance, ego and power. But when she happens to be a homemaker, they look down upon them. They regard her as down market. Often it is the matter of embarrassment for them, if their wives are mere homemakers .and if she aspires to be financially and economically independent, most of the times their male ego bursts.
Her youth and her beauty are lost cleaning the floors, cooking and bringing up kids. Constant contact with water corrodes her skin. Her dreams die out the day she becomes someone’s mistress.
Her partner sees her beauty and to him she is admirable for those two basic physiological needs, she provides her free of cost. One good food and second good sex.
English vinglish narrates the tale of so many women who stay home and are harassed without the thought of being harassed.
I chose to write this, to appeal to young girls and women, please be bit individualistic . It’s important to look for family, but not at cost of one’s dreams and self respect. Your contribution is as important to society and economy as your male counterparts.
Men should value woman who keeps house –because it’s the toughest thing to do. If your partner has sacrificed her career to bring up family, which is your responsibility as well, respect her for that. Value her for her contribution and if necessary nurture her dreams that are caged in chores, her identity has smothered inside the four walls.
An appeal to girls- get education, be economically independent so that you do not become slave like. Let your man be your partner, not master.
Be substantive so that you are being loved and admired for your priceless contribution and not when you churn down your bones inside your flesh to satisfy someone’s greed for flesh.
Let feminism prevail in every mind and every home
 And just in books and lecture tomes.
Thank you Sachin for acknowledging Anjali for her contribution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Death of reason and logic:Age of Post-Truth

"We, as a free people", wrote late Serbain American playwright Steve Teisch "have freely decided that we want to live in some post-truth world" in an essay in the Nation magazine in 1992. The essay was in the context of the Iran -Contra scandal and the Persian Gulf War. The author would not have even the faintest idea that almost twenty-five years later Oxford dictionary, on November 12, 2016 will make ‘post-truth' the word of the year. 'Post' here doesn't mean ‘after' but suggests to the time when truth becomes insignificant and irrelevant. Thanks to Brexit and the results of US Presidential elections –this failed media prophets and others in the field of psephology. However, had Oxford University paid heed to the India around and from 2014, the word Post-truth would have found its place a few years ago only! In 2014, Media machinery projected a man who hitherto was nowhere in the picture, as the "leader", the country needed on it...

Why history lessons were boring in schools?

We were not taught (told) history as it was. History lessons dealt with dates and events only, history was always about kings,wars,victories and so called larger than life things. We were just told who ruled us,for how long.We never came to know about common man's life,may be it was not worth writing or documenting(it is still not worth it,only politicians make news). History books never had chapters of North East India and its contrib ution to Indian freedom struggle.Conflict regions' making and history was never made available rather they were just called resource abundant regions. Rise of right wing (radicalisation)doesn't find mention either. History books have been agents of lies and deception. History writing is often used as tool by state to deceive it's citizens,so that the truth and facts never come out. Whether it's America,India or Pakistan,their school history lessons are self congratulatory. Currently state is busy in bringing 'In...

Nightingale got no prize at the poultry show

Einstien,Twain,Edison were born out of class, before the text proceeds , I would like to say here 'class' doesn’t mean the structure with four walls, one door, two windows, one teacher, books and the pack of chained students. Here class is the niche of brilliance, freedom, discovery, imagination and invention. I wish to have education system that forges humans with brain and not machines with grades. As a student .I always wondered, how one can go about saying two plus two equals to four? Without anyone questioning why? Just because our course book said so. Why in history "dates and events” were asked? When no one taught us the resemblance to the days which we live in. Why for learning anything new, we need old books instead of new ideas? Why make notes in class, when the brain is blank and ink in copy left no hammer on thinking? Why teachers ask us to learn by heart, while it is the mind that is required to do so.? Even Winston Churchill had a dig at his tea...