Skip to main content

Patriarchy has assaulted masculinity too.

If a man fails in any fight for strength –society says he is not enough man.
If man is not tall and handsome- society says he is not enough man”.
If a man is unable to impregnate his woman,- society says he is not man”.
If a man cries, loves compassionately and is not flesh hungry.
Society says-Come on, be a man.
 Society is not only difficult for woman to survive but for a man to prove his manliness as well. The way there is set notions of how a woman should be, the same way there are notions and stereotypes against how a man should be.
Ask anyone to define masculinity –the answer would be –“tough, rough, hard, macho, sexy physique, has unmatched libido” and if any man fails to fit within this benchmark he is referred to as less-man or crude word “namard”.

In the documentary ‘Father, son and the holy war’ by Anand Patvardhan, this reality is shown very honestly. How power is synonymous with the masculinity and masculinity with power and because of this, wars are fought, humanity is murdered.
If we open our history books we will find that all the wars were fought by men (kings), all the conspiracy against kingdom were carried by men, woman only played catalyst. Thus it is the legacy that turned masculinity to be crude, violent and harmful.

Parents gift their sons- guns, pistols, and all the tools that are violent. We give suggestions -on how to stop men from being violent and rapists. Do we ever ponder how this parenting is flawed and regressive?

This is how patriarchy has harmed both men and women, by restricting roles of both the gender and made their rigid character traits.patriarchy is responsible for gender violence (gender here does not mean only female, it means men, lesbians, gays, transgender, bisexuals). When we see policemen or society for that matter demeaning all of them especially LGBT the community, we see how this all is relative. This community lives beyond the set roles of gender set by society.
Coming back to how men suffer because of patriarchy. Fathers are generally stricter in dealing with their sons in respect to their career, livelihood and job. If you came on the earth(India) with ‘penis’-your life is set this way-good in studies, sports, sit for the toughest exams-IIT-JEE,have girlfriend for time pass ,become IAS, marry the right girl( of course right means decision by parents, relatives), earn livelihood, have well manner kids, balance your love for your mother and wife and what not.
Society tells you are not a man until you have sex,until you impale woman ,until you outperform woman in bed or frankly speaking until you have strong and hard penis.Have you ever wondered all the ads on the walls ,newspapers or Television frustrate men by content-“mardana takat ke liye sampark karien”.”How to get it hard”, making their sexuality vulnerable, by emphasizing on their sexual prowess. The documentary-father ,son and the holy war has scenes where the man is selling ‘sheelajeet’ –herb to enhance libido, he was selling as if he is selling life to man and if they don’t buy it they’ll die soon. The documentary has one scene where Muslim men are ridiculed to be eunuch or katua(referring to circumcision),like if you have to assault woman attack her breasts or vagina,if you have to assault man ,attack his penis.

Any man who is caught helping his wife, mother or sister in kitchen, is laughed off. Their masculinity is challenged if they help them in their chores and give them proper rest while they are menstruating.
So how the media is responsible for it-it reinforces patriarchy all the way. By concepts of macho-ism “tag lines such as mardo wali baat,mardo ki fairness cream.”In movies men are –strong, athletic, leaders, respected and also hooligans. Women too contribute to this phenomenon –how often women select or reject man on basis of height, personality, richness, masculinity, toughness. There is notion women love man who is enough man

Thus patriarchy has not made womanhood vulnerable but also manhood. It violates both, it cheats both, and it suppresses both. If something is too degenerating should not we challenge it?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Death of reason and logic:Age of Post-Truth

"We, as a free people", wrote late Serbain American playwright Steve Teisch "have freely decided that we want to live in some post-truth world" in an essay in the Nation magazine in 1992. The essay was in the context of the Iran -Contra scandal and the Persian Gulf War. The author would not have even the faintest idea that almost twenty-five years later Oxford dictionary, on November 12, 2016 will make ‘post-truth' the word of the year. 'Post' here doesn't mean ‘after' but suggests to the time when truth becomes insignificant and irrelevant. Thanks to Brexit and the results of US Presidential elections –this failed media prophets and others in the field of psephology. However, had Oxford University paid heed to the India around and from 2014, the word Post-truth would have found its place a few years ago only! In 2014, Media machinery projected a man who hitherto was nowhere in the picture, as the "leader", the country needed on it...

Why history lessons were boring in schools?

We were not taught (told) history as it was. History lessons dealt with dates and events only, history was always about kings,wars,victories and so called larger than life things. We were just told who ruled us,for how long.We never came to know about common man's life,may be it was not worth writing or documenting(it is still not worth it,only politicians make news). History books never had chapters of North East India and its contrib ution to Indian freedom struggle.Conflict regions' making and history was never made available rather they were just called resource abundant regions. Rise of right wing (radicalisation)doesn't find mention either. History books have been agents of lies and deception. History writing is often used as tool by state to deceive it's citizens,so that the truth and facts never come out. Whether it's America,India or Pakistan,their school history lessons are self congratulatory. Currently state is busy in bringing 'In...

Nightingale got no prize at the poultry show

Einstien,Twain,Edison were born out of class, before the text proceeds , I would like to say here 'class' doesn’t mean the structure with four walls, one door, two windows, one teacher, books and the pack of chained students. Here class is the niche of brilliance, freedom, discovery, imagination and invention. I wish to have education system that forges humans with brain and not machines with grades. As a student .I always wondered, how one can go about saying two plus two equals to four? Without anyone questioning why? Just because our course book said so. Why in history "dates and events” were asked? When no one taught us the resemblance to the days which we live in. Why for learning anything new, we need old books instead of new ideas? Why make notes in class, when the brain is blank and ink in copy left no hammer on thinking? Why teachers ask us to learn by heart, while it is the mind that is required to do so.? Even Winston Churchill had a dig at his tea...