Skip to main content

Lousy laughter


Aroma of ghee evaporates from the tikki and pani puri stall into the noses of the guests. It is under the beautiful red and white colored tent. Rectangular board reads in shimmering light “ENGAGEMENT of…….”
Then enters the woman in her mid thirties, she is draped in maroon sari with sparkling stars over it from her appearance it appears she is not well off relative of the host. Her hair is rough. The grey strands have been dyed to orange with henna.
The moment she passes along the group of affluent middle class women. The laughter erupts on the face of that woman while they gossip about her attire and classless sari.They all are dressed in the designer saris and suits. Following gossip takes place.
Woman A: hey listen next time I would gift you this kind of sari.
Woman B: excuse me.
Woman A: how can anyone wear such saris at the night? chamcham. What if I were to visit your home wearing this kind of sari?
Woman B: I would chase you down.
Who says UPA did not achieve anything substantial? The same middle class that was weak and fragile pre 1991 today has become affluent giant. As Rahul Pandita says “people while eating French fries, criticize Dr Singh, forgetting that it is because of him they are eating French fries in dominoes.”
The middle class kitchen shelves have now proudly replaced mustard oil dabbas with olive oil jars. Green tea bags have replaced red lable. Cornflakes and other ready to eat meals overflow in their kitchens.
Among so many things middle class can afford now, laughter is one of them. They only laugh whose stomachs are filled. Starving stomach never laughs.
This is why those middle class women dare laugh at the dressing sense of the woman who cannot even afford the laughter. How can she laugh?
So let’s talk about the woman in the lousy sari and her life in contrast with women with laughter.
UPA did not empower her. She still consumes mustard oil bought from kirana store. She still drinks leather waali chai.
She is one who attends parties to fulfill societal obligation of living in the society. Not for flaunting off her new dress, footware or elegant jewelry.
She wears cotton bra with broad straps, which does not fit her well, thus leaving her breasts shapeless. Affluent class now wears strapless bras or transparent strap bras. Branded bras make their breasts appear ample. That’s why their breasts are proud and her shameful.
Her skin does not sparkle -calcium, vitamin deficiency is visible from her sheen-less body.make up merely means applying bindi,laali –lipstick that’s it.
She does not read Cosmopolitan or Femina .In fact she does not read at all .that’s why she did not counter laughter over her.
She still is the passive partner during intercourse. She does not perform sex; she surrenders to it. She does not know that women around the world have started acquiring top positions in both bedrooms and boardrooms. For her husband and her sex is not the luxury, it is the temporary refuge from the harsh life.
Her talks are ordinary, she talks food, money, electricity bills, etc. while they discuss cholesterol, gym timing, club hours etc. she is underweight. She will never get lifestyle diseases like diabetes etc.
She is not aware of feminism 2.0 has given voice to already vocal women .echoes of women empowerment will never reach her doors.
By the way all the long middle class shouted for inflation problem. Those who really suffered never raised the voice, as nobody listen to the weak voice.
Congratulations to boastful and arrogant middle class you can now afford laughter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Death of reason and logic:Age of Post-Truth

"We, as a free people", wrote late Serbain American playwright Steve Teisch "have freely decided that we want to live in some post-truth world" in an essay in the Nation magazine in 1992. The essay was in the context of the Iran -Contra scandal and the Persian Gulf War. The author would not have even the faintest idea that almost twenty-five years later Oxford dictionary, on November 12, 2016 will make ‘post-truth' the word of the year. 'Post' here doesn't mean ‘after' but suggests to the time when truth becomes insignificant and irrelevant. Thanks to Brexit and the results of US Presidential elections –this failed media prophets and others in the field of psephology. However, had Oxford University paid heed to the India around and from 2014, the word Post-truth would have found its place a few years ago only! In 2014, Media machinery projected a man who hitherto was nowhere in the picture, as the "leader", the country needed on it...

Why history lessons were boring in schools?

We were not taught (told) history as it was. History lessons dealt with dates and events only, history was always about kings,wars,victories and so called larger than life things. We were just told who ruled us,for how long.We never came to know about common man's life,may be it was not worth writing or documenting(it is still not worth it,only politicians make news). History books never had chapters of North East India and its contrib ution to Indian freedom struggle.Conflict regions' making and history was never made available rather they were just called resource abundant regions. Rise of right wing (radicalisation)doesn't find mention either. History books have been agents of lies and deception. History writing is often used as tool by state to deceive it's citizens,so that the truth and facts never come out. Whether it's America,India or Pakistan,their school history lessons are self congratulatory. Currently state is busy in bringing 'In...

Nightingale got no prize at the poultry show

Einstien,Twain,Edison were born out of class, before the text proceeds , I would like to say here 'class' doesn’t mean the structure with four walls, one door, two windows, one teacher, books and the pack of chained students. Here class is the niche of brilliance, freedom, discovery, imagination and invention. I wish to have education system that forges humans with brain and not machines with grades. As a student .I always wondered, how one can go about saying two plus two equals to four? Without anyone questioning why? Just because our course book said so. Why in history "dates and events” were asked? When no one taught us the resemblance to the days which we live in. Why for learning anything new, we need old books instead of new ideas? Why make notes in class, when the brain is blank and ink in copy left no hammer on thinking? Why teachers ask us to learn by heart, while it is the mind that is required to do so.? Even Winston Churchill had a dig at his tea...